Technology Integration What have you learned about the SAMR & Trudacot models for observing technology integration Describe a lesson that you would like to try in your classroom or how you would modify an existing lesson based on the class activities and the readings and resources?
Educational Researcher, Sugata Mitra's TEDTalk, “The Child-Driven Education” shared with us how technology can be used not just as a means to an end, but focuses on the outcomes that occur. What stood out for me came from his colleague, Arthur C. Clarke," A teacher that can be replaced by a machine should be." A teacher can never be replaced by a machine if one is inspiring. But if one does only what a machine can do than they should! This talk reminded us that inspiration is key. The examples shared from third world settings truly exemplified how children can be inspired to do the most challenging tasks when inspired.The SAMR & Trudocot model poses the question of how and why we use technology in the classroom. The Trudocot model will help me assess the purpose of technology use in the classroom. In Scott Mcleod's blog (2014), he discusses how the Trudacot and SAMR can serve as models that will help us move towards the best use of technology integration. The Trudacot tool assists us in essentially evaluating how well technology is utilized. The Trudacot model will definitely assist me in assessing the use of technology in my classroom specific to the purpose of garnering higher-level thinking. My experience with technology integration becomes a battle with so many variables. There seems to be a dynamic with the intention to integrate technology and the availability or access to technology. Moving towards the higher level of integration in the SAMR model is what many of us strive towards. My biggest obstacle at this point is access to technology. This experience mirrors what was mentioned in the discussion of the Digital Divide. Schwartz (2014) speaks of the obstacles schools come across to provide an effective infrastructure for technological usage. I just had my laptop cart taken away to be replaced by 30 Chromebooks. This opportunity can be daunting to me as I have seen the endless possibilities we can use these tools for. The Trudocot and SAMR model will definitely be my right hand man as I make curriculum decisions as well as a template for how we will roll-out the Chromebooks.
Educational Researcher, Sugata Mitra's TEDTalk, “The Child-Driven Education” shared with us how technology can be used not just as a means to an end, but focuses on the outcomes that occur. What stood out for me came from his colleague, Arthur C. Clarke," A teacher that can be replaced by a machine should be." A teacher can never be replaced by a machine if one is inspiring. But if one does only what a machine can do than they should! This talk reminded us that inspiration is key. The examples shared from third world settings truly exemplified how children can be inspired to do the most challenging tasks when inspired.The SAMR & Trudocot model poses the question of how and why we use technology in the classroom. The Trudocot model will help me assess the purpose of technology use in the classroom. In Scott Mcleod's blog (2014), he discusses how the Trudacot and SAMR can serve as models that will help us move towards the best use of technology integration. The Trudacot tool assists us in essentially evaluating how well technology is utilized. The Trudacot model will definitely assist me in assessing the use of technology in my classroom specific to the purpose of garnering higher-level thinking. My experience with technology integration becomes a battle with so many variables. There seems to be a dynamic with the intention to integrate technology and the availability or access to technology. Moving towards the higher level of integration in the SAMR model is what many of us strive towards. My biggest obstacle at this point is access to technology. This experience mirrors what was mentioned in the discussion of the Digital Divide. Schwartz (2014) speaks of the obstacles schools come across to provide an effective infrastructure for technological usage. I just had my laptop cart taken away to be replaced by 30 Chromebooks. This opportunity can be daunting to me as I have seen the endless possibilities we can use these tools for. The Trudocot and SAMR model will definitely be my right hand man as I make curriculum decisions as well as a template for how we will roll-out the Chromebooks.
I would like to begin with assessing our student's knowledge of the internet. Then provide lessons on WebSite Evaluations as I see that we will be using research as a large part of our usage. Understanding the proper way to research will provide a fairly good foundation for the other levels of technology integration in the classroom. In Social Studies we do a lot of reading, writing, and note-taking. Currently we use paper-pencil ways of assessing and collaborating. The Chromebooks will be excellent tools to teach cloud computing as well as collaboration. Now our students can do live, interactive Close Reading WITH their peers (substitution level).
This is truly an exciting time in education, despite the many changes that are occurring that consume much of our time. This is something that public educator's in Hawaii are faced with at this time as our responsiblities become overwhelming as we need to fulfill our end of the Educator Evaluation System. Having the resources of the Trudocot & SAMR models will help us move not only our curriculum, but our students.
This is truly an exciting time in education, despite the many changes that are occurring that consume much of our time. This is something that public educator's in Hawaii are faced with at this time as our responsiblities become overwhelming as we need to fulfill our end of the Educator Evaluation System. Having the resources of the Trudocot & SAMR models will help us move not only our curriculum, but our students.